https://ijistra.com/journal/issue/feedInternational Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies2026-05-29T02:13:49+00:00Adilah Zafiraheditor.ijistra@gmail.comOpen Journal Systems<p>International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies (IJISTRA) is a peer-reviewed online journal (e-ISSN: 2735-0398) dedicated to provide a specialised open access platform for critical discourses on national, regional and international strategic affairs in the study of national power. <br /><br />The study of national power is an interdisciplinary study on how nations or states develop and utilise their resources such as population, geography and natural resources through all domains of national capabilities such as religion and ideology, politics and governance, urban and rural development, health and education, history and culture, science and technology, economy and industry, media and communication, international relations as well as security and defense to pursue national interests and uphold their sovereignty.<br /><br />IJISTRA publishes research articles, book reviews, keynote speeches and lectures as well as think pieces or commentaries that can contribute towards or extend the frontiers of, scholarly debate of various issues and topics in the study of national power. IJISTRA is published, owned and sponsored by Interdisciplinary Research & Strategic Studies (IRIS) Institute, an independent and non-profit research center established in 2015.</p> <p><strong>Publication Dates</strong>: May and October</p> <p><strong>Language:</strong> Malay, Arabic and English</p> <p><img src="http://ijistra.com/public/site/images/hanis_noor93/myjurnal.png" alt="" width="202" height="46" /><img src="http://ijistra.com/public/site/images/hanis_noor93/cross.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="46" /><img src="http://ijistra.com/public/site/images/hanis_noor93/gs.png" alt="" width="184" height="42" /><img src="https://ijistra.com/public/site/images/webmaster/logo-citefactor.png" /><img src="https://www.ijistra.com/public/site/images/wafiq5453/journal-stories-edit.png" /></p>https://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/121The Nation-state Philosophy and the Ummah from Wael Hallaq’s Perspective 2026-05-20T01:43:29+00:00Tom Facchineimamtomfacchine@gmail.com<p>In Wael Hallaq's work, the modern nation-state is not a transhistorical universal entity but a particular historical and epistemic configuration fundamentally incompatible with the moral architecture of Islamic governance. Building on the methodological inheritance of Michel Foucault and Talal Asad, Hallaq traces the severance of knowledge from ethics that underwrites the modern state, contrasts the untethered sovereignty of the nation-state with the tiered sovereignty of the classical Islamic polity, and discloses the structural disposition of the nation-state towards disciplinary violence and homogenisation. Against this, the ummah is an alternative configuration grounded in heterogeneity, localised authority, and an integrated pedagogy of subject formation through the Sharia and Sufism. The path forward lies in rebuilding autonomous Islamic institutions through the waqf, recovering an ethically integrated epistemology of knowledge, and strategically engaging stable Muslim-majority societies such as Malaysia and Indonesia in imagining a post-nation-state Islamic futurity.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Negara bangsa moden, dalam karya Wael Hallaq, bukanlah suatu entiti universal yang melangkaui sejarah, sebaliknya satu konfigurasi sejarah dan epistemik yang khusus, yang secara asasnya tidak serasi dengan seni bina moral pemerintahan Islam. </em><em>Berasaskan warisan metodologi daripada Michel Foucault dan Talal Asad, Hallaq menjejaki pemutusan ikatan antara ilmu dan etika yang mendasari negara moden, membezakan kedaulatan negara bangsa yang terlepas daripada apa-apa rujukan lebih tinggi dengan kedaulatan berlapis dalam tradisi Islam klasik, serta mendedahkan kecenderungan struktural negara bangsa terhadap keganasan disiplin dan homogenisasi. Sebagai alternatif, ummah merupakan satu konfigurasi yang berasaskan kepelbagaian, autoriti tempatan, dan pedagogi pembentukan subjek yang bersepadu melalui Syariah dan tasawuf. Jalan ke hadapan terletak pada pembinaan semula institusi Islam yang berdikari melalui wakaf, pemulihan epistemologi ilmu yang terikat secara etika, serta penglibatan strategik masyarakat majoriti Muslim yang stabil seperti Malaysia dan Indonesia dalam membayangkan satu masa hadapan Islam pasca negara bangsa.</em></p>2026-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studieshttps://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/123Pembentukan Elit Melayu Anglophile: Suatu Tinjauan Kritis terhadap Pembinaan Negara Malaysia2026-05-20T03:04:18+00:00Muhammad Aiman Ahmad Faudziaiman@iris.institute<p>Naratif arus perdana mengenai pembentukan Malaysia cenderung menekankan rundingan kemerdekaan, kompromi perlembagaan dan integrasi wilayah sebagai asas legitimasi negara pascakolonial. Namun, pendekatan ini sering mengabaikan persoalan lebih mendasar tentang bagaimana struktur kuasa dan epistemologi kolonial dikekalkan melalui pembentukan elit Anglophile khususnya dalam golongan atasan Melayu. Penulisan ini berhujah bahawa pembentukan Malaysia perlu dilihat sebagai proses peralihan kuasa yang dirangka untuk mengekalkan kesinambungan struktur dan sistem kolonial dalam bentuk negara bangsa moden. Dengan memanfaatkan teori elit klasik dan kerangka pascakolonial, penulisan ini meneliti strategi rekrutmen elit Melayu Anglophile sebagai mekanisme pengekalan kuasa kolonial pascamerdeka melalui (1) penyasaran golongan bangsawan dan pentadbir tempatan sebagai perantara kolonial; (2) pembinaan ilmu kolonial yang meminggirkan sistem pengetahuan tempatan; (3) sistem pendidikan kolonial bersepadu; dan (4) jaringan ideologi dan politik beracuan Barat. Strategi rekrutmen Anglophile ini membentuk kelas pemerintah pascakolonial yang bukan sekadar terlatih secara teknokratik, tetapi turut menginternalisasi rasionaliti politik kolonial. Peralihan kuasa 1957 dengan demikian dapat difahami sebagai kesinambungan terubah (<em>transformed continuity</em>), di mana negara “merdeka’’ lahir tanpa pemutusan radikal daripada asas epistemologi dan institusi kolonial. Dengan meneliti strategi rekrutmen elit Anglophile dalam pembentukan Malaysia, artikel ini mencabar kefahaman konvensional tentang kemerdekaan sebagai detik pemutusan sejarah penjajahan. Sebaliknya, ia mengusulkan bahawa kemerdekaan berfungsi sebagai konfigurasi semula struktur kuasa kolonial. Artikel ini menyumbang kepada perbahasan mengenai kenegaraan pascakolonial, elit Anglophile, dan dekolonisasi epistemik, serta penilaian semula kemerdekaan sebagai satu bentuk penyusunan semula kuasa kolonial, bukannya pengakhiran kolonialisme.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Mainstream narratives on the formation of Malaysia tend to emphasize independence negotiations, constitutional compromises, and territorial integration as the basis for the legitimacy of the postcolonial state. However, this approach often ignores more fundamental questions about how colonial power structure and epistemology were maintained through the formation of Anglophile elites, particularly among the Malay upper class. This paper argues that the formation of Malaysia should be seen as a process of power transition designed to maintain the continuity of colonial structures and systems in a modern nation-state. Drawing on classical elite theory and postcolonial framework, this paper examines the recruitment of the Anglophile Malay elite as a mechanism for the maintenance of colonial power after independence through (1) targeting local nobility and administrators as colonial intermediaries; (2) the construction of colonial knowledge that marginalizes indigenous knowledge systems; (3) an integrated colonial education system; and (4) ideological and political networks aligned with Western traditions. This Anglophile recruitment strategy formed a postcolonial ruling class that was not only technocratically trained but also internalized colonial political rationality. The 1957 transfer of power can thus be understood as a transformed continuity, in which the “independent” state emerged without a radical break from colonial epistemological foundations and institutions. By examining the Anglophile elite recruitment strategy in the formation of Malaysia, this article challenges the conventional understanding of independence as a historical break from colonialism. Instead, it proposes that independence functioned as a reconfiguration of colonial power. This article contributes to the debate on postcolonial statehood, Anglophile elites, and epistemic decolonization, as well as a re-evaluation of independence as a form of colonial power reconstitution, rather than the end of colonialism.</em></p>2026-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studieshttps://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/122Agenda Imperialisme dalam Malaysia Pascamerdeka2026-05-20T02:35:54+00:00Mohd Shazwan Mokhtarmsm@ukm.edu.my<p>Penulisan ini meneliti legasi kolonial British dalam pembentukan dan pembangunan Malaysia dengan memberi tumpuan kepada wacana penyahjajahan dalam historiografi dan ekonomi politik negara. Walaupun Malaysia mencapai kemerdekaan pada tahun 1957 dan dibentuk secara rasmi pada tahun 1963, struktur institusi politik, ekonomi dan epistemologi yang diwarisi daripada pentadbiran kolonial terus mempengaruhi trajektori pembangunan negara. Penulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan analisis sejarah kritikal berasaskan penelitian terhadap rekod kolonial, penulisan sarjana tempatan dan antarabangsa, serta wacana dasar pasca merdeka bagi menilai kesinambungan dan transformasi legasi tersebut. Perbincangan memfokuskan empat dimensi utama: (1) grand design British dalam pembentukan negara dan kerangka masyarakat majmuk; (2) polemik naratif “Tanah Melayu tidak dijajah” dan implikasinya terhadap kefahaman kedaulatan; (3) pembentukan struktur ekonomi berasaskan pengeluaran komoditi dan peranan Malaysia dalam rangkaian ekonomi imperial; serta (4) kedudukan Tanah Melayu/Malaysia dalam blok Sterling sebagai manifestasi kesinambungan ekonomi imperial pasca 1957. Analisis menunjukkan bahawa proses penyahjajahan yang berlaku bersifat berperingkat dan terhad, dengan sebahagian struktur imperial kekal berfungsi dalam bentuk baharu melalui mekanisme perdagangan, kewangan dan kerangka institusi. Penulisan ini berhujah bahawa memahami legasi kolonial secara empirikal dan kritikal bukan bertujuan menafikan pencapaian kemerdekaan, tetapi untuk memperkukuh wacana kebangsaan berteraskan sumber primer serta membina dasar yang lebih berdaulat. Dengan menilai semula naratif sejarah dari lensa tempatan tanpa menolak sepenuhnya sumber kolonial, penulisan ini menyumbang kepada perbahasan kontemporari tentang dekolonialisasi, pembinaan negara bangsa dan kedaulatan dalam konteks pascakolonial.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>This article examines the British colonial legacy in the formation and development of Malaysia, with particular attention to decolonization discourses in historiography and political economy. Although Malaysia achieved independence in 1957 and was formally established in 1963, inherited political, economic, and epistemological institutional structures continue to shape its development trajectory. The study employs a critical historical analytical approach based on colonial records, local and international scholarship, and post-independence policy discourse to assess both continuity and transformation within this colonial legacy. The discussion focuses on four dimensions: (1) the British “grand design” in shaping state formation and a plural society framework; (2) the contested claim that “Malaya was not colonized” and its implications for sovereignty narratives; (3) the development of a commodity-based economic structure and Malaysia’s integration into imperial economic networks; and (4) Malaya/Malaysia’s position within the Sterling Bloc as evidence of continued imperial economic linkage after 1957. The analysis suggests that decolonization was gradual and partial, with key imperial structures persisting in modified forms through trade, finance, and institutional arrangements. The article argues that critically engaging with the colonial legacy is not intended to negate the achievements of independence, but to strengthen national discourse grounded in primary sources and to support more sovereign policy orientations. By re-evaluating historical narratives from a locally grounded perspective while not totally rejecting colonial sources, this study contributes to ongoing debates on decolonization, nation-building, and sovereignty in postcolonial contexts.</em></p>2026-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studieshttps://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/120Pembangunan Kerangka Pendidikan Mualaf Berteraskan Epistemologi Islam dan Pendekatan Sosio-ekologi di Sarawak 2026-05-08T14:21:37+00:00Mohammed Rasheedan Ellinelrasheedan@gmail.comMohd Khairol Jamblikhairol167@uitm.edu.myMohammad Afiq Shazwan Abdul Samatrasheedanellin@gmail.comAbdul Jabbar Abdullahabdjabbar@uitm.edu.my<p>Pendidikan mualaf merupakan aspek penting dalam pengukuhan akidah, pembinaan identiti Muslim dan kesejahteraan sosial golongan mualaf di Malaysia. Namun, pendekatan pendidikan sedia ada masih bersifat fragmentasi, terlalu menekankan ritual serta kurang mengambil kira realiti sosio-budaya komuniti mualaf di Sarawak. Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan kerangka pendidikan mualaf berteraskan epistemologi Islam dan pendekatan sosio-ekologi bagi konteks Sarawak. Dengan menggunakan reka bentuk kajian kualitatif, temu bual mendalam telah dijalankan bersama enam belas orang peserta kajian dari pelbagai institusi yang berpengalaman terlibat secara langsung dalam pendidikan mualaf di Sarawak. Hasil analisis tematik mengenal pasti enam tema utama, iaitu: (1) pengukuhan tauhid dan identiti Muslim; (2) pendidikan berasaskan pendampingan; (3) pengaruh ekosistem sosial terhadap istiqamah mualaf; (4) pendidikan kontekstual budaya Sarawak; (5) pemerkasaan ekonomi dan psikososial serta (6) integrasi institusi dalam tadbir urus dakwah. Berdasarkan dapatan tersebut, kajian ini mengemukakan satu kerangka pendidikan mualaf yang mengintegrasikan asas epistemologi Islam dengan model sosio-ekologi pelbagai aras yang meliputi individu, keluarga, komuniti, institusi dan dasar. Dengan menghubungkan prinsip normatif Islam dan realiti sosial setempat, kerangka ini menawarkan pendekatan yang lebih berstruktur dan menyeluruh dalam memperkukuh pendidikan mualaf, sekali gus menyumbang kepada wacana teori dan reformasi dasar dalam pembangunan masyarakat Muslim minoriti.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Convert (mualaf) education constitutes a critical dimension of faith consolidation (ʿaqīdah), Muslim identity formation, and the socio-cultural integration of converts in Malaysia. Nevertheless, prevailing educational approaches remain fragmented, overly ritual-centric, and insufficiently responsive to the socio-cultural realities of convert communities in Sarawak. This study seeks to develop a theoretically grounded framework for convert education that integrates Islamic epistemology with a socio-ecological analytical lens tailored to the Sarawak context. Adopting a qualitative research design, the study conducted in-depth interviews with sixteen informants representing diverse institutions directly engaged in convert education in Sarawak. Thematic analysis revealed six interrelated dimensions: (1) strengthening of tawḥīd and Muslim identity; (2) relationship-based education and mentoring; (3) the influence of social ecosystems on converts’ religious perseverance (istiqāmah); (4) culturally contextualized educational approaches within Sarawak’s plural setting; (5) economic and psychosocial empowerment; and (6) institutional integration within daʿwah governance structures. Drawing upon these findings, the study proposes an integrative convert education framework that synthesizes Islamic epistemological foundations with a multi-level socio-ecological model encompassing the individual, family, community, institutional, and policy spheres. By bridging normative Islamic principles with contextual social realities, the framework advances a holistic and structurally informed approach to convert education, thereby contributing to theoretical discourse and policy reform in the development of minority Muslim communities.</em></p>2026-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studieshttps://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/94Kerangka Budaya Baharu dalam Membangunkan Tamkin Kuasa2025-02-21T04:08:16+00:00Zaidi Mohamad Jalilruzaini.adam@gmail.comMohammad Afiq Shazwan Abd Samatruzaini.adam@gmail.comMohd Shahril Atiqi Mohamed Sharipruzaini.adam@gmail.comNoorzamri Ibrahimruzaini.adam@gmail.comNoor Ruzaini Adamruzaini.adam@gmail.comZulikha Aliruzaini.adam@gmail.com<p>Tamkin kuasa ialah kuasa nasional yang bersifat menyeluruh dan meliputi pelbagai paksi seperti politik, ekonomi, ketenteraan, hubungan luar, media, pendidikan, dan kebudayaan. Budaya dikenal pasti sebagai salah satu paksi strategik yang berperanan sebagai pemangkin kepada pencapaian kuasa nasional tersebut. Berdasarkan kajian terdahulu yang mendapati bahawa kerangka budaya tempatan telah dihakis oleh penaklukan epistemologi kolonial, kajian ini mengemukakan satu kerangka budaya baharu. Kerangka ini terbina daripada asas asimilasi antara budaya dan syariat dan merangkumi identiti kebudayaan yang terdiri dari tiga rukun: (1) bangsa peradaban; (2) watan berdaulat; dan (3) agama. Kerangka ini turut mengandungi tiga aspek iaitu kebahagiaan, insaniah dan struktur kenegaraan, dengan tamkin kuasa sebagai matlamat akhir. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif menerusi analisis kandungan nas syarak, analisis dokumen berkaitan, sorotan literatur dan perbincangan dengan panel pakar. Sumbangan utama kajian ini ialah mengemukakan kerangka kebudayaan baharu yang bersepadu dan beroperasi sebagai satu sistem dalam membina sebuah peradaban.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Tamkin kuasa is a comprehensive national power that covers various axes such as politics, economy, military, foreign relations, media, education, and culture. Culture is identified as one of the strategic axes that acts as a catalyst for the achievement of national power. Based on previous studies that found that the local cultural framework has been eroded by the conquest of colonial epistemology, this study presents a new cultural framework. This framework is built on the basis of assimilation between culture and sharia, and consists of cultural identity based on three pillars: (1) civilized nation; (2) sovereign homeland; and (3) religion. This framework also contains three aspects, namely happiness, humanity and state structure, with tamkin kuasa as the ultimate goal. The study uses a qualitative approach through content analysis of Islamic texts, analysis of related documents, literature review and discussions with a panel of experts. The main contribution of this study is to present a new cultural framework that is integrated and operates as a system in building a civilization.</em></p>2026-05-29T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies