https://ijistra.com/journal/issue/feed International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies 2026-10-30T03:32:04+00:00 Adilah Zafirah editor.ijistra@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p>International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies (IJISTRA) is a peer-reviewed online journal (e-ISSN: 2735-0398) dedicated to provide a specialised open access platform for critical discourses on national, regional and international strategic affairs in the study of national power. <br /><br />The study of national power is an interdisciplinary study on how nations or states develop and utilise their resources such as population, geography and natural resources through all domains of national capabilities such as religion and ideology, politics and governance, urban and rural development, health and education, history and culture, science and technology, economy and industry, media and communication, international relations as well as security and defense to pursue national interests and uphold their sovereignty.<br /><br />IJISTRA publishes research articles, book reviews, keynote speeches and lectures as well as think pieces or commentaries that can contribute towards or extend the frontiers of, scholarly debate of various issues and topics in the study of national power. IJISTRA is published, owned and sponsored by Interdisciplinary Research &amp; Strategic Studies (IRIS) Institute, an independent and non-profit research center established in 2015.</p> <p><strong>Publication Dates</strong>: May and October</p> <p><strong>Language:</strong> Malay, Arabic and English</p> <p><img src="http://ijistra.com/public/site/images/hanis_noor93/myjurnal.png" alt="" width="202" height="46" /><img src="http://ijistra.com/public/site/images/hanis_noor93/cross.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="46" /><img src="http://ijistra.com/public/site/images/hanis_noor93/gs.png" alt="" width="184" height="42" /><img src="https://ijistra.com/public/site/images/webmaster/logo-citefactor.png" /><img src="https://www.ijistra.com/public/site/images/wafiq5453/journal-stories-edit.png" /></p> https://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/130 Imam al-Ghazali’s Epistemology and Economic Thought 2026-10-30T03:32:04+00:00 Sami Al-Daghistani sami.al_daghistani@ctr.lu.se <p>The thought of Imam Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, read as a unified opus rather than as a set of discrete texts, discloses an ethical-epistemological system in which knowledge is neither an instrument of utility alone nor a purely speculative pursuit, but a transformative endeavour bound to practice. The very notion of ilm presupposes amal: knowledge without its enactment is futile. Three ascending levels of knowledge, sensory, rational, and intuitive, structure the human vocation, and the classical division between ilm al-mu‘amala and ilm al-mukashafa integrates worldly conduct with the unveiling of divine realities. This commentary reconstructs al-Ghazali’s epistemology and traces its economic implications: a teleological ontology that binds dunya to akhira, an ethical self for whom wealth is a liability to the community, and a set of concrete prohibitions on hoarding, illicit transactions, and the abuse of the just price. The discussion then turns to the shortcomings of modern Islamic economics, which has tapped into the terminology of neoclassical economics while neglecting the intellectual and conceptual resources of the Islamic tradition itself. The way forward lies in the decoloniality of Islamic economic thought, the recovery of classical concepts such as kasb and zuhd on their own terms, and the reintegration of ethics, economy, and environment that respects the interconnectedness al-Ghazali assessed. Malaysia’s position at the frontier of Islamic finance places particular responsibility on Malaysian scholars and institutions in this reconstructive labour.<br><br><br></p> <p><em>Pemikiran Imam Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, apabila dibaca sebagai suatu himpunan karya yang bersepadu dan bukannya sebagai teks-teks yang berasingan, mendedahkan suatu sistem epistemologi beretika di mana ilmu bukanlah semata-mata alat utiliti mahupun usaha spekulatif yang murni, melainkan suatu usaha transformatif yang terikat dengan amalan. </em><em>Konsep ilm itu sendiri mengandaikan amal: ilmu tanpa pelaksanaan adalah sia-sia. Tiga peringkat ilmu yang mempunyai tingkatan, iaitu ilmu inderawi, ilmu akli, dan ilmu intuitif, membentuk kerangka panggilan insan, manakala pembahagian klasik antara ilm al-mu‘amalah dan ilm al-mukashafah menyatupadukan tatatertib duniawi dengan penyingkapan hakikat ketuhanan. Komentar ini menyusun semula epistemologi al-Ghazali dan menjejaki implikasi ekonominya: suatu ontologi teleologi yang mengikat dunia dengan akhirat, satu diri beretika yang menganggap kekayaan sebagai tanggungjawab terhadap masyarakat, serta sehimpunan larangan konkrit terhadap penimbunan, urus niaga tidak sah, dan penyalahgunaan konsep harga adil. Perbincangan seterusnya beralih kepada kelemahan pemikiran ekonomi Islam moden, yang telah meminjam istilah ekonomi neoklasik sambil mengabaikan sumber intelektual dan konseptual daripada tradisi Islam itu sendiri. Jalan ke hadapan terletak pada dekolonialiti pemikiran ekonomi Islam, pada pemulihan konsep-konsep klasik seperti kasb dan zuhd menurut istilah tradisi itu sendiri, serta pada penyatuan semula etika, ekonomi, dan alam sekitar yang menghormati kesalinghubungan yang telah diandaikan oleh al-Ghazali. Kedudukan Malaysia di barisan hadapan kewangan Islam meletakkan tanggungjawab khusus ke atas para sarjana dan institusi di Malaysia dalam usaha pembinaan semula ini.</em></p> 2026-10-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies https://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/127 The Economic Impact of Malaysia’s 2018 Political Transition: A Synthetic Control Analysis 2026-10-30T01:52:34+00:00 Muhammad Khairy Hakimi Mohd Sobri muhammad.noordin@student.manchester.ac.uk Sayed Mohammad Nasrullah Mohd Noor muhammad.noordin@student.manchester.ac.uk Aiman Mukri Mat Mukti muhammad.noordin@student.manchester.ac.uk Muhamad Farhan Mohd Azemi muhammad.noordin@student.manchester.ac.uk Muhammad Luqman Iskandar Zairudin muhammad.noordin@student.manchester.ac.uk Muhammad Nur Aqiel Noordin muhammad.noordin@student.manchester.ac.uk <p>Political transitions can cause significant economic consequences, but their causal effects are difficult to isolate. This study examines Malaysia’s 2018 Regime Change from Barisan Nasional (BN) to Pakatan Harapan (PH), which is the first change of political party since its independence in 1957. The economic consequences are measured through the change in Malaysia’s GDP per capita using Synthetic Control Method (SCM) as a quantitative analysis. SCM constructs a counterfactual measure of GDPpc as a weighted mixture of countries within the donor pool of countries with no major economic shocks around the 2018 treatment period ensuring pre-treatment comparability. Synthetic Malaysia’s GDPpc represents what might have been if there was no regime change, allowing a direct comparison with the actual GDPpc. The results indicate that Malaysia’s GDP per capita fell around $200 to $300 below the synthetic counterfactual by 2019 and fell further to $750 to $1000 by 2021. This aligns with the theoretical framework where a change in political transition leads to uncertainty, policy disruptions, and institutional adjustments. The gradual and increasing divergence suggests a time lag between the regime change and its economic consequences. Nonetheless, results should be interpreted cautiously, as the COVID-19 pandemic most likely increase the divergence from 2020 onwards.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Peralihan politik boleh membawa kesan ekonomi yang ketara, namun kesan kausalnya sukar dikenal pasti secara berasingan. Kajian ini meneliti perubahan rejim politik Malaysia pada tahun 2018, daripada Barisan Nasional (BN) kepada Pakatan Harapan (PH), yang merupakan perubahan parti politik pertama sejak Malaysia mencapai kemerdekaan pada tahun 1957. Kesan ekonomi perubahan tersebut diukur melalui perubahan Keluaran Dalam Negara Kasar (KDNK) per kapita Malaysia dengan menggunakan Kaedah Kawalan Sintetik (Synthetic Control Method, SCM) sebagai pendekatan analisis kuantitatif. SCM membina ukuran kontrafaktual bagi KDNK per kapita melalui gabungan berwajaran negara-negara dalam kumpulan penderma (donor pool) yang tidak mengalami kejutan ekonomi besar sekitar tempoh intervensi pada tahun 2018, sekali gus memastikan kebolehbandingan keadaan sebelum intervensi. KDNK per kapita Malaysia Sintetik mewakili anggaran keadaan yang mungkin berlaku sekiranya perubahan rejim politik tidak berlaku, dan membolehkan perbandingan langsung dibuat dengan KDNK per kapita Malaysia yang sebenar. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa KDNK per kapita Malaysia pada tahun 2019 berada sekitar AS$200 hingga AS$300 lebih rendah berbanding nilai kontrafaktual sintetik, dan jurang tersebut melebar kepada sekitar AS$750 hingga AS$1,000 pada tahun 2021. Dapatan ini selaras dengan kerangka teori yang mengandaikan bahawa perubahan politik boleh mencetuskan ketidakpastian, gangguan terhadap dasar serta penyesuaian institusi, yang seterusnya memberi kesan terhadap prestasi ekonomi. Jurang yang semakin melebar secara beransur-ansur juga menunjukkan bahawa terdapat kelewatan masa antara berlakunya perubahan rejim dengan kemunculan kesan ekonominya. Bagaimanapun, dapatan ini perlu ditafsirkan dengan berhati-hati kerana pandemik COVID-19 berkemungkinan besar menyumbang kepada peningkatan jurang tersebut mulai tahun 2020.</em></p> 2026-10-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies https://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/129 Kedaulatan Data sebagai Kuasa Strategik Negara: Perbandingan 79 Negara dan Kerangka Strategik bagi Malaysia 2026-10-30T02:11:21+00:00 Qamarul Nazrin Harun qamarulnazrin@uitm.edu.my <p>Kajian ini meneliti kedaulatan data sebagai bentuk kuasa strategik negara dengan menganalisis bagaimana negara menentukan tujuan, mengawal akses dan infrastruktur, mengurus pergantungan teknologi serta menggunakan data bagi memenuhi kepentingan nasional. Kajian ini didorong oleh perkembangan wacana dan dasar kedaulatan data di Malaysia yang semakin melangkaui persoalan penyetempatan (<em>localisation</em>) data dan pematuhan peraturan kepada isu bidang kuasa, keselamatan, tadbir urus, infrastruktur dan perkongsian data. Namun demikian, perkembangan tersebut masih memerlukan suatu kerangka yang menghubungkan dimensi-dimensi tersebut dengan persoalan keupayaan negara untuk mencapai kedaulatan data. Persoalan ini semakin penting apabila negara bergantung pada infrastruktur awan, perisian, rangkaian dan teknologi analitik yang dikendalikan merentasi sempadan negara. Kajian menggunakan analisis dokumen secara perbandingan terhadap 79 negara yang merangkumi ASEAN, G7, BRICS dan OIC, serta Kesatuan Eropah sebagai kes serantau. Analisis mengenal pasti tujuan strategik, mekanisme pelaksanaan, penggunaan data dan batas pelaksanaan sebelum mengelompokkan strategi berdasarkan orientasi dominan. Dapatan menunjukkan tujuh orientasi utama kedaulatan data, iaitu Dominasi Digital, Kuasa Kawal Selia, Keterhubungan Strategik, Kawalan Negara, Autonomi Teknologi, Keupayaan Negara dan Ketahanan Digital. Perbandingan menunjukkan bahawa instrumen yang sama, seperti awan kerajaan, identiti digital dan pertukaran data, boleh menghasilkan bentuk kuasa yang berbeza bergantung pada susunan institusi, teknologi, pasaran dan hubungan antarabangsa. Kajian ini mengukuhkan pemahaman tentang kedaulatan data yang menghubungkan kawalan berdaulat, autonomi teknologi, keupayaan institusi, tadbir urus, ketahanan perkhidmatan, ekosistem data dan kerjasama rentas sempadan. Kajian ini juga mencadangkan kerangka kedaulatan data bagi Malaysia dengan menyediakan asas konseptual yang lebih berorientasikan keupayaan negara dan relevan dengan cabaran kebergantungan digital Malaysia.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>This study examines data sovereignty as a form of strategic state power by analysing how countries define the purposes of data use, control access and infrastructure, manage technological dependencies, and leverage data to advance national interests. The study is motivated by the evolving discourse and policies on data sovereignty in Malaysia, which increasingly extend beyond data localisation and regulatory compliance to encompass issues of jurisdiction, security, governance, infrastructure, and data sharing. Nevertheless, these developments highlight the need for a framework that connects these dimensions to the broader question of national capacity to achieve data sovereignty. This question has become increasingly significant as countries rely on cloud infrastructure, software, networks, and analytical technologies operated across national borders. The study employs a comparative document analysis of 79 countries representing ASEAN, the G7, BRICS, and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), with the European Union examined as a separate regional case. The analysis identifies strategic objectives, implementation mechanisms, data utilisation practices, and implementation constraints before categorising national strategies according to their dominant orientations. The findings reveal seven major orientations of data sovereignty which are Digital Dominance, Regulatory Power, Strategic Connectivity, State Control, Technological Autonomy, State Capacity, and Digital Resilience. The comparative analysis demonstrates that similar instruments, such as government cloud infrastructure, digital identity systems, and data exchange platforms, can produce different forms of power depending on institutional arrangements, technological capabilities, market structures, and international relations. This study advances the understanding of data sovereignty by integrating sovereign control, technological autonomy, institutional capacity, governance, service resilience, data ecosystems, and cross-border cooperation. It further proposes a data sovereignty framework for Malaysia, providing a conceptual foundation that places greater emphasis on national capacity and addresses the challenges arising from Malaysia’s digital dependencies.</em></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2026-10-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies https://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/128 Perkembangan Perancangan Bandar di Lembah Klang 1952-1976 2026-10-30T02:03:50+00:00 Muhammad Irfan Izhar irfanizhar@iris.institute <p>Kajian ini meneliti sejarah pentadbiran dan perkembangan dasar perancangan bandar di Lembah Klang pada tahun 1952-1976. Perancangan bandar di Lembah Klang, khususnya Kuala Lumpur dan Petaling Jaya, berkembang bagi memenuhi tuntutan pembangunan ekonomi semasa pentadbiran kolonial British dan selepas kemerdekaan melalui perubahan struktur pentadbiran kerajaan tempatan serta pembaharuan perundangan perancangan bandar. Kajian ini mengisi kelompangan dalam penulisan sejarah perancangan bandar di Malaysia dengan meneliti pengaruh kolonial terhadap perkembangannya. Kajian lanjutan perlu menilai kesan dasar dan perancangan bandar terhadap kehidupan penduduk asal dan golongan imigran, khususnya dari segi ekonomi dan sosial, agar sejarah perancangan bandar tidak hanya difahami berdasarkan kepentingan ekonomi pihak kolonial atau kerajaan semasa.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>This study examines the history of administration and the development of urban planning policies in the Klang Valley between 1952 and 1976. Urban planning in the Klang Valley, particularly in Kuala Lumpur and Petaling Jaya, evolved to meet the demands of economic development under both British colonial administration and the post-independence government, as reflected in changes to local government administrative structures and reforms to urban planning legislation. This study addresses a gap in the historiography of urban planning in Malaysia by examining the influence of colonialism on its development. Future research should assess the effects of urban planning policies on the lives of the original residents and immigrants, particularly in economic and social terms, so that the history of urban planning is understood not solely through the economic interests of the colonial authorities or the contemporary government.</em></p> 2026-10-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies https://ijistra.com/journal/article/view/126 Peranan Pendidikan dalam Meledakkan Potensi Insan: Analisis Perbandingan Konsep Insaniah dalam Konteks Islam dan Humanisme Barat 2026-10-30T01:21:43+00:00 Nur Irdina Hakimah NorAzali hakimah.norazali@live.iium.edu.my Nornajwa Ghazali najman1971@gmail.com <p>Pendidikan memainkan peranan penting sebagai wadah utama dalam membangun, membentuk dan meledakkan potensi sebenar insan merentasi pelbagai peradaban manusia. Namun, kajian lepas lazimnya membincangkan falsafah pendidikan dari perspektif Islam dan kritikan terhadap humanisme Barat secara berasingan, manakala perbandingan merentasi peradaban yang dikaitkan secara langsung dengan pembangunan potensi insan masih terhad. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini bertujuan menganalisis peranan pendidikan dalam membangunkan potensi insan melalui perbandingan falsafah dan matlamat pendidikan dalam peradaban agung dunia, iaitu peradaban Cina yang berteraskan Konfusianisme, India Kuno melalui Sistem Vedik, Yunani menerusi konsep <em>Paideia</em>, serta peradaban Islam yang berpaksikan wahyu. Pendekatan kualitatif telah digunakan melalui kaedah kajian kepustakaan, analisis dokumen, diskusi ilmiah dan penyertaan dalam wacana berkaitan falsafah pendidikan. Data diperoleh daripada al-Quran, buku ilmiah, artikel jurnal, penulisan akademik serta maklumat yang relevan daripada perbincangan ilmiah. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan perbandingan bagi mengenal pasti persamaan dan perbezaan falsafah pendidikan dari aspek hakikat manusia, sumber ilmu dan matlamat pembangunan potensi insan. Kajian ini turut menganalisis pertembungan antara konsep <em>Insaniah </em>dalam Islam dengan humanisme Barat serta implikasinya terhadap epistemologi pendidikan, khususnya berkaitan isu dikotomi ilmu dan sekularisme. Dalam konteks pendidikan kontemporari, kajian ini turut meneliti cabaran orientasi pendidikan yang dipengaruhi oleh nilai-nilai komersial dan materialistik. Berdasarkan analisis tersebut, kajian ini mencadangkan falsafah pendidikan insaniah yang mengintegrasikan pembangunan potensi diri secara seimbang, menyeluruh dan bersepadu bagi melahirkan ‘insan budiman’ yang menguasai pelbagai <em>malakah</em> (potensi). Kerangka ini mengetengahkan pentingnya penyepaduan ilmu, akhlak dan amal bagi mencapai kebahagiaan hidup di dunia dan akhirat serta melaksanakan amanah sebagai hamba dan khalifah Allah SWT di muka bumi.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Education is the principal means of developing, shaping, and unleashing the true potential of human beings across civilizations. Previous studies, however, have generally treated Islamic philosophy of education and the critique of Western humanism separately, while cross-civilizational comparisons linked directly to human potential remain limited. This study therefore examines the role of education in developing human potential by comparing the philosophies and aims of education in major world civilizations: Confucian China, Vedic Ancient India, Greece through the concept of Paideia, and Islamic civilization anchored in revelation. A qualitative approach was adopted, combining library research (reviewing the prior literature), document analysis, scholarly discussions, and participation in discourse on the philosophy of education. Data drawn from the Qur’an, scholarly books, journal articles, and academic discussions were analyzed descriptively and comparatively in terms of human nature, sources of knowledge, and the aims of developing human potential. The study also analyzes the encounter between the Islamic concept of Insaniah and Western humanism and its implications for educational epistemology, particularly the dichotomy of knowledge and secularism. It further examines the challenge of contemporary education driven by commercial and materialistic values. Based on this analysis, the study proposes a philosophy of </em>pendidikan insaniah <em>that integrates balanced, holistic, and unified self-development to nurture the insan budiman, a person who masters multiple malakah (potentials). This research underscores the integration of knowledge, character, and practice to attain happiness in this world and the hereafter and to fulfill the trust of being a servant and vicegerent of Allah SWT on earth.</em></p> 2026-10-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Strategic Studies